women in leadership
women in leadership
The conference room hummed with a low, expectant energy. Sarah, a newly appointed Managing Director, had just delivered a robust presentation outlining her strategic vision for the next quarter. Her arguments were incisive, data-driven, and undeniably logical. As she concluded, a senior male colleague leaned back, a faint smile playing on his lips, and remarked, “Excellent presentation, Sarah.
Very… assertive. Perhaps a little more collaboration next time, though, for team morale?” The comment hung in the air, a subtle but unmistakable jab. Sarah had been direct, as the situation demanded, yet she was implicitly criticised for not being ‘soft’ enough.
This is the insidious reality of the double bind, a phenomenon many women leaders encounter daily, where the very qualities that propel them to the top are simultaneously used to undermine their credibility or question their leadership style.
At its core, the double bind describes a situation where an individual receives two or more conflicting messages, where success in one area means failure in another. For women in leadership, this often manifests as the expectation to be both agentic – decisive, assertive, competitive – and communal – warm, collaborative, empathetic.
Research by Alice Eagly and Linda Carli at Northwestern University has extensively documented this phenomenon, highlighting how women who display agentic traits, traditionally associated with effective leadership, are often perceived as less likeable or less feminine. Conversely, women who lean into communal traits are sometimes seen as less competent or less suited for senior roles.
This creates an impossible tightrope walk, where stepping too far in either direction risks a loss of credibility or influence. The brain, in its relentless pursuit of categorisation and pattern recognition, struggles with individuals who defy neat boxes, and societal biases, often unconscious, reinforce these contradictory expectations.
It is not a question of women being deficient; it is a systemic issue rooted in deeply ingrained social schemas.
Our brains are wired for efficiency, relying on heuristics and stereotypes to make sense of a complex world. This cognitive shortcut, while often useful, is also the breeding ground for unconscious bias.
When a woman exhibits traits that deviate from traditional gender roles – for instance, being highly assertive in a negotiation – it creates a 'schema violation' in the observer's brain. Dr. Mahzarin Banaji and Dr.
Anthony Greenwald's work on implicit bias at Harvard University, particularly through the Implicit Association Test, demonstrates how quickly and automatically we associate certain traits with specific demographic groups.
For women leaders, this means that when they embody traditionally male-coded leadership behaviours, the brain of the observer may register a disconnect, leading to negative evaluations or a perception of incongruity. This is not necessarily malicious intent; it is the brain's automatic processing system attempting to reconcile conflicting information.
The result is often a subtle but pervasive questioning of a woman's authenticity or suitability, even when her performance is objectively outstanding. Understanding this neurological underpinning is the first step towards consciously mitigating its impact.
Navigating the double bind requires more than just external strategies; it demands a robust inner game, a mastery of one's own psychological landscape. Elite athletes, accustomed to performing under intense scrutiny and pressure, offer valuable lessons here. They understand that external criticism, whether explicit or implicit, can derail performance if not managed effectively. Dr.
Carol Dweck's research on 'mindset' at Stanford University is particularly pertinent. A fixed mindset, where individuals believe their abilities are static, makes them vulnerable to external validation and criticism. A growth mindset, conversely, views challenges and feedback as opportunities for development.
For women leaders, cultivating a growth mindset allows them to interpret the double bind not as an indictment of their capabilities, but as a complex environmental challenge to be strategically navigated.
This involves developing a strong sense of self-efficacy – the belief in one's ability to succeed in specific situations – which acts as a buffer against the psychological toll of contradictory expectations. It is about anchoring one's sense of worth and competence internally, rather than allowing it to be dictated by external, often biased, perceptions.
Behavioural science provides practical frameworks for strategic self-presentation and communication, allowing women leaders to navigate the double bind with greater efficacy. One key strategy is 'behavioural blending', where leaders consciously integrate both agentic and communal behaviours.
This is not about being inauthentic, but about demonstrating the full spectrum of leadership capabilities. For example, a leader can deliver an assertive, data-driven directive (agentic) and immediately follow it with an open invitation for team input or a genuine expression of appreciation for their efforts (communal).
This signals both strength and warmth, competence and collaboration, without compromising either. Research by Catalyst, a global non-profit working to accelerate women into leadership, consistently shows that leaders who can effectively blend these styles are perceived as more effective and garner greater respect.
It is about demonstrating versatility, showing that one can be tough when necessary and empathetic when appropriate, thereby defying the simplistic categorisation that fuels the double bind. This nuanced approach allows women to project a comprehensive leadership identity that is harder for unconscious biases to pigeonhole.
Successfully navigating the double bind also involves proactive efforts to build alliances and shape perceptions within the organisational ecosystem. This is not about manipulation, but about strategic influence. Women leaders must actively cultivate sponsors and advocates, individuals who can speak to their capabilities and character, thereby counteracting negative or biased perceptions.
These allies can provide critical social proof, vouching for a leader's effectiveness and challenging stereotypes. Furthermore, actively seeking out opportunities for visible collaboration and mentorship allows women to demonstrate their communal traits in action, providing tangible evidence that contradicts the 'too assertive' stereotype.
This strategic engagement helps to broaden the narrative around a woman's leadership, moving beyond simplistic, gendered expectations. It is about creating a network of support and understanding that reinforces a holistic view of her capabilities, ensuring her credibility remains intact even in the face of subtle challenges.
The double bind is a persistent challenge, but it is not an insurmountable one. For women leaders, the path forward involves a conscious, strategic approach grounded in self-awareness, psychological resilience, and behavioural dexterity.
It means recognising the neurological underpinnings of bias, mastering the inner game of performance psychology, and applying behavioural science principles to communication and self-presentation.
It is about demonstrating that leadership is not a monolithic construct defined by outdated gender norms, but a dynamic, multifaceted capability that encompasses both strength and empathy, decisiveness and collaboration.
By consistently embodying a comprehensive and authentic leadership style, women leaders do not just navigate the double bind; they actively work to dismantle it, paving the way for a more equitable and effective leadership landscape for everyone. This is not merely about survival; it is about thriving and, in doing so, redefining what truly exceptional leadership looks like.
Core and Premium programmes with personalised expert reports and AI coaching.
View Programme Options →